On 01/28 09:15 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Carl, can you explain this idea with more details. Please. > I don't see exactly why it will be worth with this solution.
My concern is that sending the data over the wire to a NAS will be much slower than using local disk. There's a lot more operations involved in NFS requests and responses; and like I said, BackupPC tends to be disk-speed limited in my experience. If you had a SAN; that's another matter, because that's effectively local disk, even if it's on the end of a long fiber. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
