dan schrieb:

> with 3 drives in a raid5, you can lose 1/3 of the drives and still keep 
> data but you are 3x more likely to lose a drive.  in raid 0, you are 1/2 
> as likely to lose a data drive because losing a disk is not losing a 
> data drive, just a backup.  in other words, with raid5 you can only 
> afford to lose 1-(xDrives-1:xDrives) or 1/3 in a 3 disk array while 
> raid0 allows you to lose 50% of the drives..

Did you just confuse RAID-1 with RAID-0?

Despite the name, RAID-0 is not redundant, and loosing one drive in a 
RAID-0 array is disastrous for the whole array.


-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to