naigy wrote: > Still doing some testing. Not sure of the cause but one thing I do > know is that I did a incremental and a full backup from the command > line and both of these were done in the normal time of a bit over 2 > hours. Will see how it goes
that's great, so you have a backup in case you mess everything up - but it sounds strange that an incremental backup needs the same time like the full backup. Have you tried to make some more incremental backups? > For both incremental and full it is transferring approx 7.5GB of data > over the network. I thought that it was meant to be a > relatively conservative with data traffic after the > initial backup. As far as I understand traffic should be lower for incremental backups - since only changes from the last full backup should be transferred?! > My other PC's including a linux file server dont exhibit this > same behaviour (at least for the incrementals). The PC you are talking about is windows based right? Do you have other Windows-Clients within your group of "other PC's" (where backups are working as supposed)? Then you could compare the configuration files. - Kurt ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
