-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 yes, because BackupPC uses its own implementation of the rsync protocol. Nevertheless, backups that wouldn't complete with 2.6.9 now work perfectly, so I guess they must have fixed some problems on the client as well.
dan wrote: > rsync 3 will work but will function just like rsync 2 did without the > new features. > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Bernhard Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > I had similar issues (backups wouldn't complete), and after upgrading > both servers and clients to rsync to 3.0.2, the problems went away. > > I use BackupPC in two different locations with quite many clients and > have not had any issues caused by rsync 3.0.2 so far. > > --be > > Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote: >> Hi. I use rsync as my transfer mechanism. > >> I am considering upgrading rsync from 2.6.9 to 3.x, as I am unable to >> run a full backup with rsync 2.6.9 -- memory utilization's out the >> roof (lots of files to transfer) and the server slows to an unusable >> crawl. > >> rsync 3.x has this fixed.... any reason I can't tear out 2.6.9 and >> plug in 3.0.3. <http://3.0.3.>? has anybody done that? > >> Best, >> -at -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Public key at http://pgp.mit.edu/ iEYEARECAAYFAkiZKtUACgkQlUmaCwWcOxP/xgCfZ/I+qUV9yeRkkil27DQXbMmN ICgAn1h4WEJ/qBAtBs3Rn/unf4iNTisB =NoZQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
