Hello, I have uploaded a current build of version 3.0.3, for Win32 and Win64 to:
www.bacula.org/downloads Please take care -- I haven't tested either of the binaries. Best regards, Kern On Saturday 05 September 2009 16:49:26 wvoice wrote: > I actually thought switching to the same build platform that you were on > might reduce some of the variables. When I was building on SLES (I posted > my original message on it, but it's still held for moderation). > > Under my SLES environment, I was able to build most of win32. It bails out > before it actually completes bacula-fd.exe. There are complaints of > numerous libraries missing. But I've seen threads indicating they aren't > completely necessary. I don't mind switching back to that environment to > finish debugging. I'm used to the Suse environment, whereas Ubuntu is quite > different for me. > > If you can generate the win32 binaries for 3.0.3, I'd really appreciate it. > I can then do some testing while I finish debugging in parallel. > > Many thanks Kern! And I understand you can't chew that kind of time. I've > got several developers for me that I'd like to stick onto this. But I'm > doing the early work. Once I have the build environment setup, I can get > them all on the same page. We also have resources to build up test systems. > > -Mike > > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am not sure what went wrong. It seems to me that makeinfo is no longer > > distributed, so we just ignore that "warning". You are getting an error. > > See below ... > > > > Everything is described in the src/win32/README.mingw file. A number of > > people have setup both the Win32 build (rather trivial any Linux sys > > admin can do it) and the Win64 build (non-trivial -- you must be a C++ > > programmer > > to figure out the VSS problems). > > > > Unfortunately, we just don't have the time to give support. We supply > > *everything* you need: code, third-party software, and instructions, with > > the > > exception of the Windows VSS code which we cannot distribute, but we tell > > you > > where we got it. > > > > If you need help, perhaps someone on the devel list who has done it > > before can > > help you. If that doesn't work, about the only other choice is to ask > > for professional help (sorry, but that is $$). > > > > If you want to test version 3.0.3, and you need a Win32 build, let us > > know. > > We can build and post them from time to time. > > > > Good luck, > > > > Kern > > > > On Saturday 05 September 2009 16:05:01 wvoice wrote: > >> Hi Kern, > >> > >> I've installed 8.04 and am making less progress that I was with SLES. > >> Right > >> now, I am not building the cross-compile environment properly. I.e., > >> it's failing to build binutils and isn't giving much explanation. I get > >> a warning about a missing makeinfo, but that doesn't look like it's the > >> culprit. > >> > >> Here's what I'm getting: > >> > >> Patching binutils > >> ./build-win32-cross-tools: 526: patch: not found > >> Configuring binutils > >> Building binutils > >> configure: WARNING: > >> *** Makeinfo is missing. Info documentation will not be built. > >> WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it > >> if > >> you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file > >> indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious > >> call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' > >> (AIX, DU, IRIX). You might want to install the `Texinfo' package or the > >> `GNU make' package. Grab either from any GNU archive site. make[3]: *** > >> [/home/myoung/bacula-devel/bacula/cross-tools/source/binutils-2.16.91-20 > >>060 119-1/bfd/doc/bfd.info] Error 1 > >> make[2]: *** [info-recursive] Error 1 > >> make[1]: *** [all-bfd] Error 2 > >> make: *** [all] Error 2 > >> make of binutils failed - log available: binutils-mingw32/make.log > >> > >> I'm not seeing anything useful in make.log. > >> > >> Thoughts? I'm trying to generate the windows FD so I can start testing > >> out > >> 3.0.3. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> Kern Sibbald wrote: > >> > On Friday 04 September 2009 16:29:58 wvoice wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> I'm still having issues trying to build the Windows binaries for > >> >> 3.0.2 and > >> >> 3.0.3 on SLES. Is there a recommended OS and version that the core > >> >> developers are using? > >> > > >> > Ubuntu Hardy (8.04) > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Kern > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>- > >> > >> >----- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports > >> > >> 2008 > >> > >> > 30-Day > >> > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and > >> > focus on > >> > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > >> > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Bacula-devel mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >----- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > > 30-Day > > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and > > focus on > > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > > _______________________________________________ > > Bacula-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
