> > At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless there > is some really compelling reason to create one, I would prefer not -- it > would not be a huge effort to back port the patch, but it would require > rather extensive testing.
The only issue I can see with this is that it may inconvenience anyone using a distribution packaged version of Bacula. Perhaps you could make a patch available and issue it with a statement to the effect that it needs further testing? James ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
