On 02/ 2/10 03:10 PM, Richard Scobie wrote: > Robert Hartzell wrote: > >> It would seem reasonable (to me anyways) that the attributes would be >> updated to reflect the current pool. There isn't much in the way of >> documentation regarding this feature so hopefully someone can verify one >> way or the other and I dont have to set up a test to find out. > > Sort of - a job running yesterday pulled 3 tapes from the "Scratch" pool > into "Full" and while the retention time has been modified to the same > as the Full pool, the "Recycle Pool" shows "None", not "Scratch" which > is set in the "Full" pool definition. > > Perhaps this is a bug? > > Regards, > > Richard
hmmm... looks like I need to do some testing. Do you have any volumes that have been recycled and moved back to the scratch pool? -- Robert W Hartzell bear at rwhartzell.net RwHartzell.Net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
