On 02/ 2/10 04:08 PM, Richard Scobie wrote: > Robert Hartzell wrote: > >> hmmm... looks like I need to do some testing. Do you have any volumes >> that have been recycled and moved back to the scratch pool? >> > > Yes. A tape that was initially labeled in the "Full" pool has been > recycled back into Scratch and is showing "Scratch" as its recycle pool. > > I think this is not a bug - I have just checked my Scratch pool > definition and I do not have a RecyclePool defined in it. > > So updating the existing Scratch volumes should sort this out. > > Regards, > > Richard
I've been reading the manual and to me its not at all clear about the RecyclePool directive. According to the manual, This directive is probably most useful when defined in the Scratch pool, so that volumes will be recycled back into the Scratch pool. Which says to me that RecyclePool should be defined in the scratch pool and not the Full pool. Does this mean that the RecyclePool attribute is attached to the volume when it's initially created in the Scratch pool and remains if effect throughout its lifetime? This seems to be opposite of what you have defined in your working setup. Maybe I'm reading cross-eyed or something but I'm unable to obtain a clear understanding. Can anyone describe how exactly this directive is used? -- Robert W Hartzell bear at rwhartzell.net RwHartzell.Net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users