Hi Uwe,

We are using MySQL. It hasn't been optimized for bacula usage. I installed both 
bacula and mysql via apt-get. We aren't using spooling. These are just local 
backups. The director / sd machine was bought in 2009 and has 2 Intel Xeon 
E5410, 2.33 GHz CPUs and 16 GB memory. Disks are SATA. I'm out of town today 
and tomorrow and will try to find other specs tonight or this weekend.

I ran another test: I backed up the imaging data tarfiles to the same disk pool 
as I used for the operating system test backup. The rate was 23 MB/s, same as 
backup of the imaging data tarfiles to tape.

Thanks!
Dave

________________________________________
From: Uwe Schuerkamp [uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 6:30 AM
To: Lewis, Dave
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula backup speed

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:06:42AM +0000, Lewis, Dave wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm configuring Bacula backups and sometimes it is very slow to back up to 
> disk or tape, around 1 MB/s and sometimes slower. I'm wondering why it is 
> sometimes so slow and if there is something I can do differently that will 
> speed up the backups. I want to do backups of about 1 TB (or more) of user 
> data, and 1 MB/s is far too slow. I also want to back up operating systems of 
> various Linux servers and imaging data (currently stored locally).
>
> As a test, I ran a Bacula backup of several operating system directories of 
> the backup computer, and it took about 6 hours. Here are details:
> The directories were /bin, /boot, /etc, /lib, /lib64, /opt, /root, /sbin, 
> /srv, /usr
> Level = Full
> Disk pool
> Computed SHA1 signature
> >From the log file:
> 02-Dec 20:16 jubjub-sd JobId 547: Job write elapsed time = 06:03:29, Transfer 
> rate = 216.4 K Bytes/second
> Elapsed time:           6 hours 13 mins 54 secs
> FD Files Written:       391,549
> SD Files Written:       391,549
> FD Bytes Written:       4,486,000,544 (4.486 GB)
> SD Bytes Written:       4,720,733,845 (4.720 GB)
> Rate:                   200.0 KB/s
> Software Compression:   None
> Encryption:             yes
> Accurate:               no
>

Hello Dave,

well, it depends. ;-) On a lot of things, actually. What DB backend
are you using? Is the db optimized for bacula usage? How fast are your
disks? Are you using attribute / job spooling? What's the hardware
spec of the director / sd machine? What's your connection / max
throughput to the clients?

All the best, Uwe

--







IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail is meant only for the use of the intended 
recipient. It may contain confidential information which is legally privileged 
or otherwise protected by law. If you received this e-mail in error or from 
someone who is not authorized to send it to you, you are strictly prohibited 
from reviewing, using, disseminating, distributing or copying the e-mail. 
PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND DELETE THIS 
MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. Thank you for your cooperation.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to