Hello, wt., 16 kwi 2019 o 17:29 Josh Fisher <jfis...@pvct.com> napisał(a):
> > On 4/16/2019 10:45 AM, Dmitri Maziuk via Bacula-users wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:24:10 -0300 > > Marcio Demetrio Bacci <marcioba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> 5. Currently the OS and Backup disks are on the same DRBD volume, so > >> would it be better to put the OS disk out of the DRBD volume? (the VM > >> has frequently crashing what makes me think that excessive writing on > >> the disk may be impacting the OS) > > I would put everything out of drbd volume because quite frankly I don't > > see the point. I don't think you can fail over in a middle of a backup, > > and without that, why not just put OS on NFS? -- or ZFS and send > > incremental snapshot as part of your manual failover. Using drbd for > > backup storage is just a waste of disk. > > > Running jobs will fail, Assuming jobs fail because we failover the Bacula Director service, right? > but the automated "Reschedule On Error" feature > allows restarting them after the fail-over. Well, no. Rescheduling is based on actual job thread running on Bacula Director. Any Director restart will stop this feature for a particular jobid! best regards -- Radosław Korzeniewski rados...@korzeniewski.net
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
