Please could you check the configuration directive fdstorageaddress in the client
Create your WiseStamp email signature <https://www.wisestamp.com/lp/promo/professional-email-signature?utm_source=promotion&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=create_your_own&srcid=> [image: __tpx__] Andrea Venturoli <m...@netfence.it> escreveu em sáb., 27/04/2024 às 10:21 : > Hello. > > I'm deploying a completely new installation and I'm both facing some new > problems to solve and using 15.x for the first time, so I'm not sure if > I'm doing things wrong or if Bacula is misbehaving. > > > > > > First problem: clients are spread across three different VLANS. > While I only have one storage daemon, listening on all interfaces, > clients will need to contact it through different addresses. > I.e. > _ clients in VLAN 1 need to use sd.a.mydomain.it; > _ clients in VLAN 2 need to use sd.b.mydomain.it; > _ clients in VLAN 3 need to use sd.c.mydomain.it. > > I found no way of doing this without declaring three "Storage" resources > in bacula-dir.conf. > Is this the best way to do this? Or are there better alternatives? > > As a consequence of the above, I declared three "Device"s in bacula-sd > (since this is an HD-based storage, I just made three different > directories). > Again, is this the best way to do this? > > It's more or less working, but the SD will often hang with one "Device" > or two working and the third stuck (with clients on the affected VLAN > all "waiting on Storage xxxx"). > Is this a bug that I need to investigate or am I just using the SD in a > way that it's not supposed to work? > > Should I let three different SD run? > (This would somewhat complicate management, but I can't think of any > stopper). > > > > > > Aside, I've always done backups in sequence (one at a time); alas the > number of clients and amount of data in this installation require that I > start doing them in parallel. > > If I understand correctly, doing multiple jobs in parallel on one SD > means that data from different clients will be interleaved in a single > volume. > Is this correct? > Since I'd like to have one job per volume, is there any way to have a > single SD/device open multiple volumes at once? > > The above configuration (three Devices) allows me to do at least three > jobs in parallel (one per VLAN) without interleaving data. > However, is this supported or am I just asking for troubles? > > > > bye & Thanks > av. > > > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
