Wrong, you are not a competitor. We don’t do any Bacula community and never did
-- Regards Reiner Jung CTO/ChaosOps M:tier Ltd. Email [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > On Dienstag, Juli 07, 2026 at 3:19 PM, Heitor Faria <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > "faaleoleo.io (http://faaleoleo.io) — who is behind the > "[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])" attacks > An anonymous sender using the identity "Dev Team" [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]) has been posting hostile attacks on NGBackup, > both directly and to the public bacula-users mailing list. The domain and > email headers tie this identity to the Bacula / BareOS circle in Germany, > specifically to Reiner Jung (M:Tier). > > SPF evidence. The SPF record for faaleoleo.io (http://faaleoleo.io) (which > authorizes who may send email on its behalf) lists: > > 178.63.245.123 → www.mtier.org (http://www.mtier.org) (M:Tier, Reiner Jung's > company) > So faaleoleo.io (http://faaleoleo.io) explicitly authorizes M:Tier's server > to send mail for it. The domain also shares the same host and SPF IP block as > its mail server mail.sec4share.me (http://mail.sec4share.me). All > infrastructure is Hetzner, Germany. > > Header evidence (stronger than SPF). The hostile email of 7 Jul 2026 ("Re: > [Bacula-users] The NGbackup"), From [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]), was addressed To: Heitor Faria and Reiner > Jung [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]). An earlier attack (4 Jul) > was addressed to Heitor and Arno Lehmann [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]), another long-time Bacula figure. All messages > sent via mail.sec4share.me (http://mail.sec4share.me) using the "Canary" > client, with DKIM failing for @faaleoleo (consistent with a > throwaway/impersonation domain). > > Conclusion. The anonymous [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]) identity is operated from, and SPF-linked to, > M:Tier's infrastructure, and Reiner Jung is a named party on the attack > thread. This is the German Bacula/BareOS circle using a non-attributable > identity to attack a competitor. What is not provable is the exact person who > typed each message (the WHOIS registration is privacy-masked); the records > prove the infrastructure and the circle, not signed authorship." > > Is this true, Reiner? > On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 8:00 AM Dev Team <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > Heitor, > > > > NOBODY can/will run a backup on SAP which is not certified! You will loose > > your support same moment. I think I know SAP and requirements well. SAP > > have very hard requirements even how your setup for testing - staging and > > production must look like. > > > > Your is based on what? active active, stand by, bow failover work. how you > > get a quorum? > > > > I really would like to talk to a customer of you which is experience of > > your new development. Which if your customer use a Mainframe? Government i > > know the responsible people in Brazil and I could ask them they know > > anything about NG backup. 0r maybe SERPO? All my contacts dont know > > anything about NGbackup > > > > > > > > > On Dienstag, Juli 07, 2026 at 2:11 PM, Heitor Faria > > > <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > Hello Reiner, > > > > > > Thanks for the detailed note. It's clear you read the material closely, > > > so let me answer point by point. > > > > > > PodHeitor vs NGBackup. You're conflating two different products (thanks > > > for being my fan). PodHeitor was built on Community Bacula and deprecated > > > for the better stuff. NGBackup is a from-scratch engine: 1,000+ Rust > > > source files, zero C, memory-safe by construction. That's not a marketing > > > adjective. It's why the whole class of memory-corruption CVEs that legacy > > > engines keep publishing cannot occur here. So "nothing has changed since > > > PodHeitor" is simply wrong. Everything under the hood changed. > > > > > > "Just repackaged community plugins." Every NGBackup plugin is written in > > > one standard language, Rust, compiled and memory-safe. That is materially > > > more performant and more serious than the open-ended > > > PowerShell/Python/shell scripts that other suites rely on for their > > > plugins. Uniform tooling, no interpreter sprawl, no per-plugin runtime > > > surprises. That is original engineering, not copy-paste. > > > > > > High availability. This is real HA, not file copying. NGBackup runs an > > > active/standby Director pair with product-managed catalog and > > > configuration replication. It supports automatic failover with witness > > > quorum and a split-brain guard, plus planned, unplanned, maintenance and > > > test failover modes, and failback with reverse sync. Calling that > > > "SCP/SFTP somewhere" is not accurate. It is a designed control-plane HA > > > architecture, and it is exactly what enterprise backup HA is supposed to > > > mean. > > > > > > Deduplication. There's nothing to misunderstand here. Any backup > > > specialist knows dedup ratios improve as more repetitive, retained > > > backups accumulate. We state the industry-standard 20x, with some > > > environments exceeding 60x at higher retention and redundancy. That's a > > > range tied to retention, reported exactly the way every dedup vendor > > > reports one. Not a lab trick. Arithmetic. > > > > > > Where else we are ahead of Bacula Enterprise: > > > > > > A single control plane. Every daemon (Director, SD, FD) is remotely > > > reconfigurable, reloadable and restartable from one place, including > > > remote SD/FD config edits with validation, atomic apply and rollback. > > > Bacula has none of this. > > > Config-as-data. Director configuration lives in the database as > > > immutable, versioned revisions. No config-file sprawl across daemons and > > > plugins. > > > No clear-text passwords in files. Enrollment is token-based. Secrets are > > > sealed, never written in plaintext to a .conf. > > > Modern and vastly more complete Web and console interfaces. > > > Mainframe / SAP HANA. We have real customers running both in Brazil. The > > > ADABAS plugin ships today. z/OS binaries are being built. On SAP HANA > > > specifically, the absence of a formal certification badge doesn't mean > > > the capability can't be delivered. Certification is a commercial and > > > partnership step, not a technical ceiling. We have customers on it. > > > Bloom filters and segment locality in Dedup for better performance. > > > > > > Pricing. Enterprise backup is quote-based across this market. Bacula > > > Enterprise and the other vendors don't publish price lists either. Ours > > > is the same model, with a concrete migration discount for teams leaving > > > Veeam, Commvault or NetBackup. > > > > > > On the "copy-paste" thesis generally. A single Rust control plane, > > > active/standby HA with automatic failover, config-as-data in the catalog, > > > tokenized enrollment with no plaintext secrets, and Rust-native plugins > > > are not things the community project offers. That is original design, and > > > it's shipping. > > > > > > I'll note, since it's relevant to the tone here, that you have a > > > commercial relationship with Bacula Systems, and this critique arrives > > > alongside messages on LinkedIn that I'd characterize as threats. I'm glad > > > to have a technical debate on the merits. I'd rather keep it there. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Heitor Faria > > > NGBackup / NGStructures, LSG Global Group > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 6:41 AM Reiner Jung <[email protected] > > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > > Heitor, > > > > > > > > It looks as if the only real selling point of your solution is that it > > > > is written in Rust. Apart from that, if you take a closer look at what > > > > you are trying to sell here, it is just marketing fluff. > > > > > > > > Let’s take ransomware detection as an example. It is more than doubtful > > > > that what you are selling now is any different from what you already > > > > tried to market some time ago as PodHeitor. It was ineffective and > > > > pointless then, and nothing here suggests that has changed. > > > > > > > > Your claim of deduplication with a 60x factor is highly questionable. I > > > > have no idea how you arrive at such numbers – presumably under > > > > idealized lab conditions with a carefully selected configuration that > > > > has little to do with reality. > > > > > > > > You also write: > > > > > > > > “From the mainframe to Microsoft 365 in one place — 21 database, > > > > virtualization and cloud plugins.” > > > > > > > > I assume you do not have a mainframe at home, and it does not appear on > > > > your actual plugin list either. This makes your marketing statement > > > > misleading at best. As PodHeitor there was ever SAP HANA. You never can > > > > provide this as you must be a partner and you are not. > > > > > > > > Your so‑called “high availability” is no such thing; at most it is a > > > > simple failover where you copy files somewhere else using SCP/SFTP. > > > > Architecturally, this is just wrong and falls far short of what real HA > > > > means in enterprise backup. Is this really automatic failure? Ask you > > > > AI, it is not. > > > > > > > > Your entire solution looks just as fragile as your previous offerings > > > > that you kept promoting with bpipe and similar tools. > > > > > > > > There is also no transparent price list, just a vague promise to be 50% > > > > cheaper than Veeam. Where are your actual prices? On your own site, you > > > > instead advertise discounts of “≥ 50% off your current Veeam / > > > > Commvault / NetBackup contract,” which raises even more questions about > > > > how realistic and sustainable your pricing is. > > > > > > > > Based on the documents you have published in the past, it is doubtful > > > > that you even fully understood what your AI-generated material is > > > > saying. > > > > > > > > Most of the features you list here are not innovations at all but a > > > > cheap copy of what you have simply recompiled or repackaged from Bacula > > > > Community, which already offers many plugins and advanced backup > > > > functions in open source form. > > > > > > > > The more interesting question is how you and your development team > > > > intend to further develop Bacula Core itself, or whether you are once > > > > again just waiting for the next community release so you can copy new > > > > features into your product. > > > > > > > > Innovation does not come from copy and paste. It comes from original > > > > design, real-world testing, and delivering value beyond what the > > > > community has already built. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Atenciosamente, > > > > > > Heitor faria (Miami) > > > https://ngbackup.com (https://ngbackup.com/) > > > WhatsApp: +1 786-726-1749 | +55 61 98268-4220 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Bacula-users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > (mailto:[email protected]) > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > > > -- > Atenciosamente, > > Heitor faria (Miami) > https://ngbackup.com (https://ngbackup.com/) > WhatsApp: +1 786-726-1749 | +55 61 98268-4220 > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
