In a message dated 12/9/2004 10:35:22 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is quite likely that by first developing in Does this postulate that those in the early stages of the study of the
Faith have no valid opinions or personal interpretations? I like the bias of the
Ruhi editors less and less the more I read it. I have done four of the Ruhi
books myself and the further they get from the rigid "method" of Book 1, the
better I like them.
Regards,
Scott
__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu |
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Popeyesays
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Smaneck
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Mark A. Foster
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Smaneck
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Mark A. Foster
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Michael Alcorn
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Mark A. Foster
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Dick Detweiler
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Mark A. Foster
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Dick Detweiler
- Re: No "Personal Opinions" in Ruhi Smaneck