The Baha'i Studies Listserv
That is the second time you mentioned the word, "perennialism." What does
that concept mean? I am ignorant of it.



On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Susan Maneck <sman...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The Baha'i Studies Listserv
> Good job taking Baha'u'llah's statement out of context!
>
> Let's look at the question Baha'u'llah was actually being asked:
>
>  “Among the Manifestations of the past one hath, in His time, allowed
> the eating of beef while another hath forbidden it; one hath permitted
> the eating of pork whereas another hath proscribed it. Thus do their
> ordinances differ. I entreat the True One, exalted be His name, to
> graciously specify the appropriate religious prohibitions.”
>
> Baha'u'llah was reluctant to answer this question not because He was
> critical of Islam but because His answer would have involved admitting
> that the Shariah was not binding for all time. Here is the answer He
> provides later in this Tablet:
>
> "The answer was therefore sent down from the heaven of the Divine Will
> in an implicit manner. Indeed the statement in the first passage where
> He saith: “The All-Knowing Physician hath His finger on the pulse of
> mankind” was, and remaineth, the answer to his 36 question. He further
> saith: “Be anxiously concerned with the needs of the age ye live in,
> and centre your deliberations on its exigencies and requirements.”
> That is, fix your gaze upon the commandments of God, for whatsoever He
> should ordain in this day and pronounce as lawful is indeed lawful and
> representeth the very truth. It is incumbent upon all to turn their
> gaze towards the Cause of God and to observe that which hath dawned
> above the horizon of His Will, since it is through the potency of His
> name that the banner of “He doeth what He willeth” hath been unfurled
> and the standard of “He ordaineth what He pleaseth” hath been raised
> aloft. For instance, were He to pronounce water itself to be unlawful,
> it would indeed become unlawful, and the converse holdeth equally
> true. For upon no thing hath it been inscribed “this is lawful” or
> “this is unlawful”; nay rather, whatsoever hath been or will be
> revealed is by virtue of the Word of God, exalted be His glory."
>
> What Baha'u'llah is rejecting here, is not Islam, nor the Prophet or
> the Qur'an. He is, however, rejecting the Perenialist  approach to
> religion favoured by the 'ulama, by Gilberto and even by Manakji with
> whom Baha'u'llah was corresponding.
>
> __________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:matthewhaa...@gmail.com
> Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:
> leave-549472-953325.e9a9b042dd227e4657deb0ff0d384...@list.jccc.edu
> Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to
> ly...@list.jccc.edu
> Or subscribe:
> http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
> Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
> Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
> Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
> News (on-campus only) - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
> Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
> New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
>
>

__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:arch...@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to 
mailto:leave-549489-27401.54f46e81b66496c9909bcdc2f7987...@list.jccc.edu
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to ly...@list.jccc.edu
Or subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News (on-campus only) - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Reply via email to