35 156 92 sold 9524 barrels oil in july '08. as far as hess's completion techniques, i dont know, they play it close to the chest. some on here have posted that hess can't complete wells. so i took a look at a few fields they operate in and found that in each case when they were compared directly to their peers on the basis of bopd/well over a period of time, hess was equal or a little better than their peers. as far as i know, no one has posted any data that disputes this.
and as i have stated before, hess does not issue a press release every time they complete a well. time will tell, run and gun doesnt seem to be their style. if one were to take a look at all the wells outside parshall, my guess is that hess is about average. On Oct 1, 7:25 pm, "paul giannotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now THAT makes sense. Your right, the well that you referred to (State Well) > has NOT done very well. My conversations with Hess has only said that our > well has done better than that one. However, from what you said, that's not > saying much. We only have 80 acres so we are looking for as much bopd as we > possibly can get. You lost me when you started talking about swell packers > and multiple fracture, please explain. What can I do now that the well is > drilled? Anything? Whats the chances of another well being done in our > sections? (35/25) > > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:43 PM, bradaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sorry if my post got you down(or did you look at some of the > > numbers?). The well next to yours is RS-State-156-92 36-25H-1 and is > > no longer confidential so someone might be able to post numbers for it > > to see what you can expect. > > As far as I know Hess and Marathon are still completing the horizontal > > wells as 1 section instead of using swell packers and doing multiple > > fracture stages(up to 12 in a 1280 acre well). > > Worked with Hess drilling wells and at the Tioga gas plant in the late > > 80s and early 90s so it has been awhile. They were a good company to > > work for and seemed to make good decisions. So it doesn't make much > > sense to me either. Big oil companies can get away with not maximizing > > their potential tho. The smaller ones have to do better or they might > > not be in this business too long. > > > On Oct 1, 1:57 pm, "paul giannotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Man, that was depressing reading that!!!!! What is Hess doing that the > > > others are not? (to get less production) How have "you worked with Hess" > > and > > > what do you mean when you say "they seem stuck on completing there wells? > > > Why would they not want to get as much oil from the well they just > > invested > > > 5 million dollars in to? Does not make a lot of sense to me. > > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:45 PM, bradaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I did look up the well after you gave us your well info and saw that > > > > it was done by Hess. If you look at some of the postings here on the > > > > group or compare Hess wells to other completions, you will see that > > > > they do not seem to get the production out of their wells that nearby > > > > operators are getting. > > > > I've worked with Hess in the past and looking at the company, they > > > > seem to be a well-run company. But they are stuck on completing their > > > > Bakken wells to where a good well for them is a 250-300 bopd IP when > > > > most others are getting 500-600-1000 bopd IP. For the mineral owners > > > > and the state, I'd love to see them do better but its their money and > > > > they control their wells. > > > > > On Oct 1, 1:00 pm, "paul giannotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Thank you for the welcome. What do you mean "condolences on your > > well"? > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:16 AM, bradaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Welcome to the group. It's an informative venue and entertaining > > also > > > > > > when some of us get into it(Rufus and elwood are kinda like 'Old > > > > > > Faithful'). > > > > > > And condolences on your well. > > > > > > > On Oct 1, 8:48 am, "paul giannotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > 156/92/section 35 Mountrail County > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Rufus O'Malley < > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > Wecome, Paulie G, and congrats on the well. In order for > > anyone to > > > > > > > > track anything on your assets, > > > > > > > > they would need section-township-range of which County your > > well is > > > > > > > > ...best regards, Rufus > > > > > > > > > On Sep 30, 9:22 pm, Paulie G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I am new to the group, I have a well in the Ross Field. Went > > > > > > "on-line" > > > > > > > > > on July 11th still on "confidential until November 15th. Look > > > > forward > > > > > > > > > to chatting with you all.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bakken Shale Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
