Probably not since the fracturing job is performed by a third party, who is coincidentally the same third party that performed the other successful frac jobs.
To some extent the occassional bad well is just how the cookie crumbles in that if this were easy and the same amount of oil was everywhere, everyone would be doing it and there wouldn't be so much money at stake. That and quite simply, geological formations are rarely homogenous and isotropic (the exact same) over any modest distance (few miles). The subtle differences between the great and good wells is likely no more identifiable than the differences between the good and uneconomic wells. Now, all that being said I must caveat the whole thing with a "yes" for I have seen wells that were all but ruined by frac jobs. Ended up producing less oil and more water afterwards. Thankfully this isn't the norm. On Oct 2, 6:40 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good question. > > On Sep 30, 1:35 pm, go-devil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I dont want to slam any companies, but whats with the bad wells? > > Can we blame it on little if any Fracing.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bakken Shale Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
