Bummer. I cant's bring up any stats on the well. It looks like it
will be on confidential status until 11/15/08
On Oct 3, 11:15 am, "paul giannotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RS Becker well @35/156/92 its a Hess Well. Went on line July 11, 2008.
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:05 AM, DepME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What well are you talking about Paul?
>
> > Just for a comparison, I pulled up data on the Bice 1-29H. It had an
> > IP of 516 bopd. Over it's 3 months lifetime, it has averaged 91
> > bopd. And then there is the Austin 8-26H. It had an IP of 3070
> > bopd. Over 144 days it has averaged 1206 bopd. Both of these are
> > recent TFS wells.
>
> > Does an IP rating mean anything in real life?
>
> > On Oct 3, 9:10 am, "paul giannotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What can be done about an under performing well? Being where my well is
> > > located I would expect to get a minimum of 1000 bopd. I'm now getting
> > about
> > > 600. What can be done?
>
> > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:45 AM, bradaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > And sometimes the job done while drilling can give you an
> > > > underperforming well.
>
> > > > And speaking of performing a frac job, there was a fire that burned
> > > > all the trucks and equipment this week on the Wayzetta 14-02H. Haven't
> > > > heard what started it, and thankfully no one was hurt. But the trucks
> > > > and equipment for the frac job were let burn once it started so we
> > > > have one less completion crew in the Basin for now. Hopefully, it
> > > > won't affect the final completion of the well.
>
> > > > On Oct 3, 7:11 am, elwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > that is a good explaination. when one realizes the complexity of
> > > > > performing a 12 stage frac job, the mind boggles. so imo, the
> > > > > variations are mainly a function of regional and random variations in
> > > > > reservoir quality, probably mainly (natural) fracture intensity, and
> > > > > random variations in where the hydraulic fractures are propagated.
>
> > > > > On Oct 3, 8:29 am, "Allen S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Probably not since the fracturing job is performed by a third
> > party,
> > > > > > who is coincidentally the same third party that performed the other
> > > > > > successful frac jobs.
>
> > > > > > To some extent the occassional bad well is just how the cookie
> > > > > > crumbles in that if this were easy and the same amount of oil was
> > > > > > everywhere, everyone would be doing it and there wouldn't be so
> > much
> > > > > > money at stake. That and quite simply, geological formations are
> > > > > > rarely homogenous and isotropic (the exact same) over any modest
> > > > > > distance (few miles). The subtle differences between the great and
> > > > > > good wells is likely no more identifiable than the differences
> > between
> > > > > > the good and uneconomic wells.
>
> > > > > > Now, all that being said I must caveat the whole thing with a "yes"
> > > > > > for I have seen wells that were all but ruined by frac jobs. Ended
> > up
> > > > > > producing less oil and more water afterwards. Thankfully this
> > isn't
> > > > > > the norm.
>
> > > > > > On Oct 2, 6:40 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Good question.
>
> > > > > > > On Sep 30, 1:35 pm, go-devil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > I dont want to slam any companies, but whats with the bad
> > wells?
> > > > > > > > Can we blame it on little if any Fracing.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Bakken Shale Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
