that is a good explaination.  when one realizes the complexity of
performing a 12 stage frac job, the mind boggles. so imo, the
variations are mainly a function of regional and random variations in
reservoir quality, probably mainly (natural) fracture intensity, and
random variations in where the hydraulic fractures are propagated.


On Oct 3, 8:29 am, "Allen S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably not since the fracturing job is performed by a third party,
> who is coincidentally the same third party that performed the other
> successful frac jobs.
>
> To some extent the occassional bad well is just how the cookie
> crumbles in that if this were easy and the same amount of oil was
> everywhere, everyone would be doing it and there wouldn't be so much
> money at stake.  That and quite simply, geological formations are
> rarely homogenous and isotropic (the exact same) over any modest
> distance (few miles).  The subtle differences between the great and
> good wells is likely no more identifiable than the differences between
> the good and uneconomic wells.
>
> Now, all that being said I must caveat the whole thing with a "yes"
> for I have seen wells that were all but ruined by frac jobs.  Ended up
> producing less oil and more water afterwards.  Thankfully this isn't
> the norm.
>
> On Oct 2, 6:40 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Good question.
>
> > On Sep 30, 1:35 pm, go-devil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I dont want to slam any companies, but whats with the bad wells?
> > > Can we blame it on little if any Fracing.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Bakken Shale Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to