Thank you all for your input. I'm not going to sell. Hope I'm making the right decision. But this is the oil business and anything could happen. Wish me luck. Sounds like it has been permitted, so hopefully EOG will drill. Again, Thanks to all.
On Oct 5, 9:50 pm, "Rufus O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Still, like Duane said. Patience. Must be some of the fine upstanding > hardworking 'investors' (aka: hustlers) that Rubie talked about? > TEll EOG. Don't sell, in my opinion. > > On Oct 5, 8:25 pm, Offroad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > There has not been a well drilled on 154N 89W section 19. Only a > > permit. > > > On Oct 5, 7:29 pm, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You will likely get $3000 an acre in royalty payments in one year of > > > production from the already drilled well. > > > Patience, Patience. > > > > David > > > > On Oct 5, 7:39 pm, Duane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Why would you want to sell your interest in a well that EOG(the > > > > premier production Company in the area) has DRILLED and Permit 17290. > > > > I would suggest you contact EOG and DO NOT SELL > > > > > On Oct 5, 4:33 pm, silk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm sorry. It was for my mineral rights which are leased with a 1/6 > > > > > royalty. Thanks, I'll backtract. > > > > > > On Oct 5, 5:20 pm, "Rufus O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Silk --- again, welcome. You did not say if the offer was for a > > > > > > Lease or are you being approached by Permian or some other to BUY > > > > > > your > > > > > > minerals at that per acre price..... if it is to buy -- backtrack > > > > > > again in the threads -- this was just discussed at length several > > > > > > times with input from many on the board..... > > > > > > > Geeez, if it's to lease, that's another story, I think. After I woke > > > > > > up from a dead faint, I would probably clean my glasses, read it > > > > > > again, and run it to my lawyer to make sure that I'm not missing > > > > > > something really important --- if it is truly a lease, things like > > > > > > depth clauses, Pugh clauses, etc.... > > > > > > > $3000/pma to lease sounds too good to be true .... > > > > > > rufus > > > > > > > On Oct 5, 12:38 pm, silk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi. I'm new here and have really enjoyed reading all the posts. I > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > 30 mineral acres in Sec. 19-154-89. I have been offered $3000.00 > > > > > > > per > > > > > > > acre. My minerals are leased with a 1/6 royalty. Just wanted to > > > > > > > ask > > > > > > > anyone if this is a fair price. I live in Texas and this board is > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > only place I can get information about this hugh play. Again, > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > for such a great board.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bakken Shale Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
