Paul, are you new to internet forums? This topic pertains to "the power of surface owners" and you are hijacking it with something totally unrelated, which is called hijacking the thread.
You want to talk about reality? I was called a fool when I predicted last summer that oil could go to 60 when everyone else was talking 200. I've lived through the 80s and 90s and I'm full aware of what oil prices do to drilling activity. If you find people "flexing your knowledge" here boring or offensive, then perhaps you should move along to someplace else where being a blowhard is the norm. You want to express your frustration about your failing investments, there a lot of investment forums out there. This forum is about the Bakken, not what is happening to your investments. On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:11 PM, paul giannotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It doesn't have anything to do with surface owners. Who says that the topic > has to be about surface owners. I thought this was an open discussion group, > and we can talk about ANYTHING we want to talk about. I'm sorry Teegue, if I > offended you by bringing up reality, sometimes I thing a lot of guys like > yourself just like to "flex your knowledge" on a topic out of boredom or ego > or both! Again I am sorry you were offended by my frustrations. But I am > very very frustrated watching my investment drop over 60% in 3 months!!!!!! > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Teegue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Paul, what does your comment have to do with the topic here of surface >> owners? >> >> Let's keep it on topic. >> >> If you don't want your well producing, tell your lessee. I don't need >> to hear about it. >> >> On Nov 8, 6:48 pm, "paul giannotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > What are we all talking about? If this drop in crude continues, the same >> > will happen that happened in 1980's!!! WE'RE DONE! PUT A NAIL IN IT >> FOLKS. >> > NO ONE IS GOING TO MAKE MONEY AT $50 A BARREL EXCEPT THE OIL COMPANIES. >> i >> > HOPE THEY SHUT DOWN MY WELL, i DON'T WANT TO SELL AT THESE PRICES, I >> WOULD >> > RATHER WAIT! >> > >> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > > Rufus, >> > > You made this statement: ""In ND, when lands were sold, the minerals >> > > never >> > > went with the surface, except where denoted in the transfer >> > > documents."" >> > >> > > I have not researched this, but it would be my opinion that when >> > > surface acres were sold the mineral acres went with the surface acres >> > > unless the contract specifically excluded the mineral acres. >> > >> > > If you can point me to a resource on this, I would appreciate it. >> > >> > > On Nov 7, 11:43 pm, go-devil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > Sorry but no one is giving up any minerals. >> > > > There are rules set in place for drilling. >> > > > You either have minerals or you don't, plain & simple. >> > > > Anyone telling someone to consider such a thing is crazy. >> > >> > >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bakken Shale Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
