Paul, what does your comment have to do with the topic here of surface owners?
Let's keep it on topic. If you don't want your well producing, tell your lessee. I don't need to hear about it. On Nov 8, 6:48 pm, "paul giannotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are we all talking about? If this drop in crude continues, the same > will happen that happened in 1980's!!! WE'RE DONE! PUT A NAIL IN IT FOLKS. > NO ONE IS GOING TO MAKE MONEY AT $50 A BARREL EXCEPT THE OIL COMPANIES. i > HOPE THEY SHUT DOWN MY WELL, i DON'T WANT TO SELL AT THESE PRICES, I WOULD > RATHER WAIT! > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Rufus, > > You made this statement: ""In ND, when lands were sold, the minerals > > never > > went with the surface, except where denoted in the transfer > > documents."" > > > I have not researched this, but it would be my opinion that when > > surface acres were sold the mineral acres went with the surface acres > > unless the contract specifically excluded the mineral acres. > > > If you can point me to a resource on this, I would appreciate it. > > > On Nov 7, 11:43 pm, go-devil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sorry but no one is giving up any minerals. > > > There are rules set in place for drilling. > > > You either have minerals or you don't, plain & simple. > > > Anyone telling someone to consider such a thing is crazy. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bakken Shale Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
