On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Pradeep Gowda <prad...@btbytes.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Anand Chitipothu <anandol...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Aaargh, few hours after I decide that I run into this. From an intent >>> perspective it is much more consistent with what I was looking for - >>> http://www.pauldeden.com/2009/01/edendb-thin-flexible-and-fast-python.html >>> >>> The sample usage is listed here >>> http://code.google.com/p/edendb/ > >> web.db is more elegant than that. > > Excellent! Anand. > > Evidently the "web" part of web.py makes people underestimate the > power and compactness of web.py > > A simple scan through the web.db module [1] would have given all the > information about > > - abstraction -- Tables are objects, column data is accessible via dot > operator. So, a very nice abstraction. > - supports all the databases he wanted [mysql, pg, sqlite, oracle, > firebird AND mssql] > > The syntax is definitely more pythonic and self-explanatory than edendb. > > And unlike edendb [from what i can i tell from the one blog post], > web.py is used in production by scores of sites.[..]
Yes. At the very least, web.db is older and more mature than edendb. I'm confused Dhananjay. What exactly were you looking for that web.db didn't provide which edendb did whe you evaluated the former? -- ~noufal http://nibrahim.net.in _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
