the one who found the missing part was me. but it was very easy. a friend of mine wolfgang maier told me that he has the complete score and he send the violin part and I gave the part to hubert. the different parts of the score are in different places...... I was at the concert in vienna where hubert and the ensemble played only radold music and it was very fine music! yours, peter
Am 07.11.2010 um 16:59 schrieb Edward Martin: > Chris, > > Thanks for your note. I agree with all stated, in that it is good > music, although not deep. Yes, the violin is a little bit too > strong, for my taste.i > > The liner notes reveal some interesting facts... apparently, the > parts were scattered in various areas, making great difficulty in > assembling the concertos. All parts were then together, with the > exception of the first violin part in the concertos. One of the > lutenists in the project, Hubert Hoffman, started writing the missing > violin parts, and after near completion of the work, somebody found > it the missing part!! Yesterday I had a conversation with an old > friend, Doug Towne. In discussing this, he laughed, stating, "They > should have asked me... I've had it since the late 70's". > > The lutenists involved in the recording are Hubert Hoffman, Sven > Schwannberger, and Klaus Kob. I have never heard of any of these > performers, but they certainly performed these works well. > > ed > > > > > > > At 08:41 AM 11/7/2010, Christopher Wilke wrote: >> Bernd, >> >> Thanks for the link. And thanks very much to Martyn for >> writing the article. Very interesting and informative stuff. I >> wonder why Radolt has received so little attention. >> >> On one point, though, I can't agree with Martyn: von Radolt's >> music is not of "negligible musical worth." I won't argue that it >> is the deepest stuff, but it is pleasant to listen to and there are >> some surprises to keep you interested. Overall, I would recommend >> the recording that Ed mentioned by Ars Antiqua Austria although I >> find the violin to be a bit too forward in the recorded mix. They >> definitely did not follow Radolt's explicit instruction that "the >> soprano part that is the small lute must at all times be set >> strongly" and tripled in volume in relation to the other parts. (I >> suppose they were after an "overall composite sound.") >> >> Actually, I know very little about this recording. I bought it >> on iTunes about a year ago and there is no booklet (shame on >> them!). I could hear that there was more than one lute on there, >> but the performers' names are not even listed online. How hard is >> it to include a digital booklet, people? >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> Christopher Wilke >> Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer >> www.christopherwilke.com >> >> >> --- On Sun, 11/7/10, Bernd Haegemann <b...@symbol4.de> wrote: >> >>> From: Bernd Haegemann <b...@symbol4.de> >>> Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Wenzel von Radolt >>> To: baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu, "Edward Martin" >> <e...@gamutstrings.com>, "Martyn Hodgson" <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> >>> Date: Sunday, November 7, 2010, 4:40 AM >>> >>>> See my paper in FoMRHI Quarterly No >>> 44 July 1986 C-737 : 'Von Radolt's >>>> instructions to lute players (Wien >>> 1701)' >>>> >>>> This gives a translation of the >>> instructions and a commentary on the >>>> lute sizes/pitches required. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> see >>> >>> http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-044.pdf >>> >>> >>> B >>> >>> >>> >>> To get on or off this list see list information at >>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >>> >> >> >> > > > > Edward Martin > 2817 East 2nd Street > Duluth, Minnesota 55812 > e-mail: e...@gamutstrings.com > voice: (218) 728-1202 > http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name > http://www.myspace.com/edslute > > >
