On 27/09/2010 22:11, Chris Frey wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:23:01PM +0100, Toby Gray wrote: > ... >> My initial feeling was to treat both cases the same, as there's clearly >> something we don't understand going on, so it's probably best to get a >> bug reporting that Barry doesn't work than to carry on. However I'd be >> happy to continue the current behaviour of just skipping packets of 1 >> byte length. > Maybe I missed it, but where do we skip packets of 1 byte in length? > If it is something special in m_raw_channel.cc, in order to make it > work, I'm ok with skipping such packets in that context alone. > But I didn't think we had such a case in the general library. > Hi Chris,
I've made the changes in my github branch git://github.com/tobygray/barry.git in commit c7685942140b123bf110. Is that the sort of change you were thinking of? I've also got a couple of other changes on my branch, d7a5c884f47ed96a7795 and b72b7c5cd2bf5d94756c which fix build issues I was having with building Barry on a PC-BSD machine. Regards, Toby ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Barry-devel mailing list Barry-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/barry-devel
