Matt Rogers wrote: >> The second solution is more appealing, but I would rather get a >> working version with what we have got now. Therefore, I will go with >> the first suggestion. >> > > We actually have thought about interfacing with Akonadi for data > storage/caching. If we do that, would we get Nepomuk integration for > "free" as well?
Just an FYI about this: I changed how kjots stores data so that it can use Akonadi for access to the notes. http://dot.kde.org/2010/02/17/kjots-takes-advantage-innovations-kde- development-platform KJots accesses the notes as Mime documents (KMime::Message objects) from Akonadi. Akonadi stores the notes in mime format in maildir containers (one note per file). The mime format could also be used to store the images in the note directly in the note, but I haven't got around to doing that (though there is API for it I think). http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2387.html The way Akonadi stores the notes is irrelevant to the application. They could just as easily be in mbox format (one single file for a group of notes). The application just uses the KMime::Message objects that Akonadi returns. Even if you don't make basket use Akonadi yet it could make sense to store the notes as mime messages and use KMime to (de)serialize them. All the best, Steve. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Basket-devel mailing list Basket-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basket-devel
