Thanks Vincent. I also found out from experimentation that removing the type attribute altogether also works with Batik (I.e., <script> [CDATA ...). Are there any good references on the differences between ecmascript and javascript? For instance, in javascript I can refer to the global "window" but Batik freaks out if it sees the same javascript reference, so I had to remove it. I hope its not Pandora's box with respect to the differences between ecmascript and javascript. After all, our collective interest in the Batik community is to get progress SVG and get it in the hands of many.

Best regards,

-Don

From: Vincent Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Batik Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Batik Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why does Squiggle complain about javascript?
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:12:59 +0200

Hello,

The type should be "text/ecmascript" not "text/javascript".

There are multiple examples of scripting using ECMAScript in the samples/tests/spec/scripting directory.

Regards,
Vincent.

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to