"Vincent Hardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> The type should be "text/ecmascript" not "text/javascript".

Since Batik has a JavaScript interpreter (not an ECMAScript one, although
the non-compliances are minimal...) could it not also respond to a made up
javascript mime-type just as it responds to a made up ECMAScript one.

Jim.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to