Re: Why does Squiggle complain about javascript?

[Thomas DeWeese]

Jim Ley wrote:

"Vincent Hardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

The type should be "text/ecmascript" not "text/javascript".
   

Since Batik has a JavaScript interpreter (not an ECMAScript one, although
the non-compliances are minimal...) could it not also respond to a made up
javascript mime-type just as it responds to a made up ECMAScript one.
 

Hi Jim,

   Sure but the SVG specification doesn't require it :)
   I'm not sure why you would _want_ to introduce new 'equivilent' 
script types.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]