Ronan Waide wrote: > I'm applying this as is. A better choice would be for emacs to > support bignums, maybe... If you compile XEmacs on a 64 bit compiler, you will have no problem. And XEmacs is seriously looking into direct bignum support with little overhead for numbers that are still small. -- Colin _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
- bug in lisp/bbdb-mhe.el chad
- Re: bug in lisp/bbdb-mhe.el Ronan Waide
- Colin Rafferty