Ronan Waide wrote:

> I'm applying this as is. A better choice would be for emacs to
> support bignums, maybe...

If you compile XEmacs on a 64 bit compiler, you will have no problem.

And XEmacs is seriously looking into direct bignum support with little
overhead for numbers that are still small.

-- 
Colin

_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to