On January 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > What's the best solution for library writers then? Do you know > of any code examples where this is handled well?
I think the right way to go about this, and certainly the way I intend pushing the BBDB source, is to firstly centralise all the versioning nonsense, secondly to use either macros or fset as appropriate for the undefined functions, and thirdly to name the macros/fsets with a bbdb- prefix. Thus instead of building our own replace-in-string, it becomes bbdb-replace-in-string and has appropriate support either through fset, a function, or a macro to do the actual replace-in-string work. Cheers, Waider. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me. "It's a horrible thing to watch, almost like watching an infant tottering toward a porcupine." - Kyle Jones on MIS people writing C _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
