On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Ronan Waide stated: > It probably helps if you keep your BBDB file size down. I know that my > own 400-odd entries parse pretty quickly, and to be honest I could > probably prune it further.
400? And I thought I was a pathetic no-hoper with no friends with 7000-odd entries. (I guess it's all to do with whether you snarf BBDB entries from Usenet or not...) FWIW, I agree that it would probably be a rather bad idea to change BBDB's backend storage format, but I'm debating trying to store them in postgresql --- not for any particular reason, just for the hell of it. XEmacs supports PostgreSQL access natively, and I want an excuse to use it. :) -- 2003-02-01: the day the STS died. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
