> * Roland Winkler <jvax...@tah.bet> [2012-07-10 10:06:50 -0500]: > > On Tue Jul 10 2012 Sam Steingold wrote: >> > It appears that binding bbdb-allow-duplicates to t is the easiest >> > solution here. >> >> Thanks. Is it seriously expected that one's internet acquaintances >> should have unique names? > > From the docstring of bbdb-allow-duplicates (which I did not change) I > assume that the assumption that names are unique has been present in > BBDB for quite some time. The assumption certainly underlies all > bbdb-mua-* commands and functions.
Until recently, I was not warned on such duplicates. The first loading of bbdb takes an extra second for each pair of dupes, so I have to wait for half a minute for bbdb to start. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) X 11.0.11103000 http://www.childpsy.net/ http://iris.org.il http://jihadwatch.org http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://camera.org C combines the power of assembler with the portability of assembler. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
