On May 17, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Evan wrote:

Have you ever used BBEdit a lot with the FTP feature? It is turtle- slow. Try opening a file in BBEdit using the built-in FTP, then try opening the same file using something like Transmit (a great app from a great company that doesn't treat legitimate customers like thieves). It is on the order of 10-100x slower using BBEdit. If I have 20 FTP documents open in BBEdit, I tend to like to keep them open, because even with the otherwise-convenient workspace feature, it takes MINUTES to launch BBEdit and have it reopen all those documents through FTP. Starting up and shutting down BBEdit repeatedly to work around the fact that Bare Bones wishes to treat paying customers like criminals is a real pain in the ass when you've got a lot of FTP documents open.

Try it sometime, you might have a different opinion.

Evan,

I have tried it (I do it daily), and I do have a different opinion. I actually find it quite fast, and not turtle-slow, but only in MY specific case, which might actually be very different from yours.

Therefore, some points of confusion/clarification/curiosity:

1.) By "FTP feature" do you mean SFTP? And are you opening documents "using File->Open from FTP/SFTP Server..." or using the always-open "FTP/SFTP Browser"?

Personally I find the former quite slow (as you say) and the latter quite quick, since it maintains the remote connection.

2.) By "otherwise-convenient workspace feature", what do you mean, exactly?

I personally go to File->New->File Group to save the state of my working document drawer, and then when shut down BBEdit, start it back up, and open that saved File Group (which contains pointers to exactly twenty remotely-openable SFTP documents on various Linux and Unix boxes), it takes 43 seconds to open them all (and yes, two of those twenty are rather large Apache log files).

I don't find 43 seconds inconvenient or turtle-slow. I do understand that the minutes (how many, exactly? two? three? ten? fifteen?) that it takes to open your twenty remotely-openable SFTP documents would be very inconvenient (because that is an order of magnitude slower than what I experience). However, I'm just quite curious for clarification as to whether or not you are using the same operations (SFTP Browser to open new ones, File Group to save and re-open old ones) that I am using.

I have quite often found that people's complaints about BBEdit's supposed slowness vis-a-vis SFTP have to do with them not knowing about the SFTP Browser or about File Groups (because, for example, using File->Open from FTP/SFTP Server is indeed very slow in comparison). It is quite likely you already do know about them, and that your twenty documents are simply larger than mine, or your network is slower, or your remote machines are slower, or your local Mac is slower (I have an iMac G5). If all of them are slower, then all these factors combined could conceivably cause that order of magnitude of difference in the amount of time required to open the documents. Right?

-carole

------------------
Carole E. Mah
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Scholarly Technology Group
Computing and Information Services
Brown University
http://www.stg.brown.edu/



--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a feature request? Not sure the software's working correctly?
If so, please send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not to the list.
List FAQ: <http://www.barebones.com/support/lists/bbedit_talk.shtml>
List archives: <http://www.listsearch.com/BBEditTalk.lasso>
To unsubscribe, send mail to:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to