Hi, I think that Francesco agrees with me, so 0x42 is ok for firmware capabilities.
Cheers, Lorenzo On Apr 9, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Thursday 09 April 2009 12:36:42 Francesco Gringoli wrote: >> On Apr 9, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Michael Buesch wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday 08 April 2009 02:11:16 Michael Buesch wrote: >>>> Completely untested patch to implement firmware capabilities >>>> and automagic QoS-disabling. >>>> >>> >>> So could somebody who uses opensource fw test this? >>> >>> Module parameter qos=0 should not be needed anymore. So please test >>> opensource fw >>> with qos=1. >> Hi Michael, >> >> cool! These are excerpts from dmesg. All the times connectivity was >> ok. > > Ok nice. > If you guys think 0x42 still is a good SHM offset, I'll submit it > upstream. > > -- > Greetings, Michael. > _______________________________________________ > Bcm43xx-dev mailing list > Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
