Subject: 5 cent charge for email


>

> Friday, January 04, 2002 5:09 PM

>

> Subject: E-Mail Charge

>

>

>                Guess the warnings were true.  Federal Bill 602P 5-cents

per

>

> > > > > >   E-mail sent.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   It figures!  No more free E-mail!  We knew this was coming!!

>

> > > > > >   Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a

>

> > > > > >   5-cent charge on every delivered E-mail.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay

online

>

> > > > > >   and continue using E-mail.  The last few months have

>

> > > > > >   revealed an alarming trend in the Government of the United

>

> > > > > >   States attempting to quietly

>

> > > > > >   push through legislation that will affect our use of the

>

> > > > > >   Internet.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be

>

> > > > > >   attempting to bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage

>

> > > > > >   fees."

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a

>

> > > > > >   5-cent surcharge on every e-mail delivered, by billing

Internet

>

> > > > > >   Service Providers at source. The consumer would then be

>

> > > > > >   billed in turn by the ISP.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay

>

> > > > > >   to prevent this legislation from becoming law.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   The US Postal Service is claiming lost revenue, due to the

>

> > > > > >   proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 in

>

> > > > > >   revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad

>

> > > > > >   campaign: "There is nothing like a letter."

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail

>

> > > > > >   per day in 1998, the cost of the typical individual would be

an

>

> > > > > >   additional 50 cents a day -- or over $180 per year -- above

and

>

> > > > > >   beyond their regular Internet costs.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal

>

> > > > > >   Service for a service they do not even provide.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   The whole point of the Internet is democracy and

>

> > > > > >   noninterference. You are already paying an exorbitant price

for

>

> > > > > >   snail mail because of bureaucratic inefficiency.  It currently

>

> > > > > >   takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from coast to

>

> > > > > >   coast.  If the US Postal Service is allowed to tinker with

>

> E-mail,

>

> > > > > >   it will mark the end of the "free" Internet in the United

>

> States.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   Congressional representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even

>

> > > > > >   suggested a "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet

>

> > > > > >   service" above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail

>

> > > > > >   charges.  Note that most of the major

>

> > > > > >   newspapers have ignored the story the only exception being

>

> > > > > >   the Washingtonian which called the idea of E-mail surcharge

>

> > > > > >   "a useful concept who's time has come" (March 6th, 1999

>

> > > > > >   Editorial).  Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away!

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   Send this E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your

>

> > > > > >   friends and relatives to write their congressional

>

> representative

>

> > > > > >   and  say

>

> > > > > >   "NO" to Bill 602P.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   It will only take a few moments of your time and could very

>

> > > > > >   well be instrumental in killing a bill we do not want.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >   PLEASE FORWARD!

>

Reply via email to