Thanks Lloyd, That makes much more sense. I have a lot of problems with a Laboratory attached to Sales Organisation and I would also have a lot of difficulty with the use of Radionics in this area. When I am doing soil reclamation work, that requires a Lab Test, I use one of two Labs, then pay a consultant I greatly respect, to interpret it and make recommendations. I have the client pay both directly. When it comes to doing the actual work resulting from it, I will supervise the client's employees or contractors, for a fee, but that is my limit of involvement.
At the risk of sounding puritanical (And I have been intentionally pushing a few comfort zones on this list), Radiesthesia/ Radionics is only reliable when done with complete detachment. I do not see how Radionics can be reliably used, if there is a potential for personal gain or loss involved. Others have talked of working from a position of Love. That is one way of stating it. For Radionics/ Radiesthesia to be of value, it must include utter independence of the practitioner. Personally I think in terms of "having no ownership" in the out come. I strive to put my self in a space, what ever the out come, it is of no concern to me. I do not mean that this is a position of not caring, but that I recognise that every situation in which a person finds them selves, they have made some contributing action to that situation. I have client files on my desk with people wanting "Golden Bullets" for situations they have created, ranging from a the physical, to relationship issues. While I will do what I can and work with empathy, I will avoid emotional involvement. Gil Lloyd Charles wrote: > Hi Gil --- Yeah I did it again eh -- garbled my message! > I was referring to the use of radionic analysis to build > physical fertiliser programs which is a bit outside of BD but common > practice in "eco farming" circles. When we couple this with the situation of > commission sales or permanent employment (the product seller)representing a > particular product (supersoup brand x or whatever) then there is a real > problem. This is already happening and is getting radionics a bad name. Some > of these guys will be at that "weekend special " I referred to. This is the > sort of thing you are trying to stop and a major reason that I agree with > you even tho I have no proper training!! > > Cheers Lloyd Charles > > Gil wrote > > I am a little puzzled by " how on earth can an operator (regardless of > his > > inherent honesty) get a proper and beneficial analysis result when the > whole > > purpose and INTENT of sitting down at the instrument was to increase his > > sales of brand X supersoup or whatever ". > >
