>Allan writes: <<some sort of baseline for the substances>> >Well, yes...FWIW. But let's never forget that it's FORCES we're working >with here, not just substances. Brer Lovel's "The Nature of Forces" bears >re-reading.
Well yes, and no, Woody. When we're talking BC and Pfeiffer Field Spray, we've got lots of physical possibilities also. I'm not looking for real 'answers' with these tests. I'm mostly interested in seeing if BD practitioners have 'short cuts' to 'compost tea'-type effects. To look at 500 in the same fashion would require looking at 501 in the same fashion. I sort of think that that says it all. Thanks for your reminder. -Allan
