Dear Allan, You were asking about compost tea type shortcuts. This one does not deal with a compost tea type effect but a shortcut way of increasing the pH while putting out the 500. One of our local group members, Nigel White runs his 500 through flow forms random intermittently during the month before putting it out. The interesting part is that he crushes up some quartz into pieces that will fit into the flow forms and not be washed away, somewhere about 1-2" in diameter.Over the first year the pH increased from 5.0 to 5.6. Considering that the farm had been BD for the last 14 years, and this was the first time that this had been done there it could indicate that it may be a technique to follow up and see if the results can be replicated. The pond that the flow forms run into carries enough water for 500 to be put out over over fourteen hundred acres. There has been lots of talk about using trees as transmitters, or field broadcasters and all sorts of other methods. This pond acts as a broadcaster over the farm because it follows the witness of the 500 that has been sprayed out, because some of the 500 which had been sprayed is always in the pond, and the two arealways connected. Using the witness method of broadcasting enables you to change what is happening over your property without having to actually treat the area physically by going over it. whole area. When the flow forms are running they revitalise the 500 that had already been sprayed out. The line of broadcast is horizontal to the water level of the pond and instead of it just being spread over 1400 acres it now spreads over an area considerably further out from Nigel's place. Howzat for a nifty idea. If you understand the nature of subtle energies you can use all types of things as radionic broadcasters. I hope that the drought breaks soon on the East coast. Regards and best wishes, James
----- Original Message ----- From: "Allan Balliett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:29 PM Subject: Re: Re[2]: Compost for Brewers > >Allan writes: <<some sort of baseline for the substances>> > >Well, yes...FWIW. But let's never forget that it's FORCES we're working > >with here, not just substances. Brer Lovel's "The Nature of Forces" bears > >re-reading. > > Well yes, and no, Woody. When we're talking BC and Pfeiffer Field > Spray, we've got lots of physical possibilities also. > > I'm not looking for real 'answers' with these tests. I'm mostly > interested in seeing if BD practitioners have 'short cuts' to > 'compost tea'-type effects. > > To look at 500 in the same fashion would require looking at 501 in > the same fashion. I sort of think that that says it all. > > Thanks for your reminder. > > -Allan > >
