Dear list, The problems with the work of Lili and Eugen Kolisko is that all the work that I have seen never resolved an optimum potency which was common to all plant or agricultural work. Potentisation rates of homoeopathic remedies is not an exact science that says that if you use this potency you will get this result. even amongst homoeopathic chat lists there is no common acceptance that this , or that potency is better than another, it just that this person used this remedy at this potency and achieved this result. As a general rule the greater the similarity to the drug picture the higher potency that you will use, the smaller the dose the more beneficial the results. The potencies for agricultural elimination use will be far different to those potencies used for enhancing life force. Even potencies are only really applicable for that particular time in that particular situation.. The question is what potency will achieve the result that i am looking for with the minimum amount of substance. Peter Rheumkoff has removed white ants from a house by broadcasting a pepper at LMM potency. The use of homoeopathic dose in large scale agricultural applications has only really become possible with the development of modern radionic instruments. It is one thing to do pot trials, another to work over the vastness of some of Australia's cattle and sheep country. Just try the logistics of stirring and applying preps over 500,000 acres as some BD practitioners do in Australia. When you are using spiritual forces to counteract something, the greatest source of knowledge of the effects of your work will come from the spiritual realms. Follow your guidance as to what the optimum potency would be. I have tried at other times to get people on the list to discuss what they are doing potency wise with their preps. I have used BD preps at potencies of up to CM [a dilution of 1/1000 done 100 times] with great results. There are three effective methods of checking potencies:
1.] The use of a radionic analysis instrument such as a Don Mattioda or Malcolm Rae instrument, a Bio Photon instrument, a Bruce Copen or an SE-7 will all give an automatic reading of potencies.Use of a radionic instrument will give you an exact potency reading. They will give you a reading of vitality which you can use to compare the effects of different potencies or treatment options. 2.] The use of a refractometer to test the effects of what you are doing. This method is promoted by people such as Arden Andersen and Phillip Wheeler 3.] The use of dowsing. As accurate as any radionic instrument. Any one in Australia who is interested in Agricultural radionics can come to one of my courses, where I cover techniques of dowsing and radionics suitable for agricultural appplications. The use of any one of these techiques have been discussed at length in the list over a period of time. In many cases the correct rate, or alternatively potency rate could be the subject of intellectual property which someone may not want to give out. Just write to Glen and ask for how he makes his remedies. Even if he did tell you everything that he has learnt from his experience you would still not have that innate grasp of homoeopathy that comes from experience. Potentisation can never be a cook book science. You will develop a feel for the essence of what you are trying to do, the next thing is to experiment in the same way as the Kolisko's did. There is never an easy way of gaining knowledge. Second hand knowledge without a feel for the subject can lead many a person into strife because the experimenter can affect the outcome of the experiment. I hope that this post will stimulate some discussion of methods and techniques of agricultural radionics. Sincere regards from the "Land of the Wizards of Oz" James Hedley. Radiasesthesia and Radionic Analysis Radionic Insect and Parasite control Bioethical Agriculture Consultant ----- Original Message ----- From: "Allan Balliett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 8:40 PM Subject: Kolisko's Work was Re: Viability of Homeopathic Potencies > I posted the comment below in the hopes of stimulating some interest > in posting and discussing the work of the Kolisko's through their > monumental book, Agriclture of Tomorrow. > > Gosh, it didn't provoke a single rise. > > Is there really no interest on BD Now! in this most important work, > which was initially directed by RS himself? > > -Allan > > > >>About eight or ten years ago, I heard a talk by an agricultural > >>homoeopath, who > >>stated some potencies sedated, while others stimulated, some are life > >>supporting and some are life suppressing. I can't find my notes at the moment > >>and I wondered if you had come across this or found it in the work you have > >>done. I am concerned that some of us armed with only part knowledge, may be > >>using potencies that have an effect other than the one we are aiming to have. > > > >Gil - The Kolisko's tracked this information and reported it in > >AGRICULTURE of TOMORROW, which, unfortunately, is out of print. What > >you say is correct: one potency may do wonders and the next 'higher' > >may do almost the opposite. Potentization, for the practical farmer, > >is something you want to know a lot about before you start using it > >on your crop lands or pastures. > > > >I was posting some of this this information to BD Now! last year, > >but the apparent lack of interest didn't make it seem worth the > >effort(s). > > > >For those in North America who want an introduction to potentization > >from an experienced practitioner, don't miss Glen Atkinson at the > >Mid-Atlantic Biodynamic Food and Farming Conference on Oct 4-6 of > >this year or his workshop later in the month in Northen California. > > > >-Allan > >
