Gday Roger
Lets have a bit of fun with this
> 1. Did Steiner really intend BD502-507 to be used solely in compost
> manufacture? No
>
> 2. Did he identify equisetum as BD508 or was it someone else?
> Someone Else
> 3. Is there a 'missing' BD509? If so, what might it and its purpose be?
> Yes Horn Clay
> *****************
> I have absolutely no experience or background knowledge to back this up -
just a mental picture of Steiner lecturing to those farmers years ago and I
dont think the numbers were part of the deal at that stage I reckon they
were someone else's invention at a later time. There is no number system
used in the Kolisko book , they refer to the various preparations as
"dandelion prepared as indicated by Dr Steiner" or similar terminology. I'm
a raw newcomer to this but for me the numbers dont fit for the man and what
he was doing at the time. I guess there will be a bunch of people come out
to prove me wrong - good - I'll stand corrected (and unconvinced)
Cheers all
Lloyd Charles
