On Friday, 11 January 2019 07:22:51 UTC-2, Martin Blais wrote: > > That seems like a useful thing to investigate. > I personally would welcome making Beancount a major mode if that interacts > well with it and it serves most people. > It seems to be the most intuitive way for most people. > I only ever use org-mode major + beancount minor myself. > If I recall, Stefan once made a case that it ought to be a major mode > (over a dinner heavy on raclette cheese some years ago, if my memory > serves). > > What major mode do people use, and would anyone object strongly and if so > why? >
Major-mode = text-mode (just because I don't use it for anything else. It's my fake major-beancount.) Minor-modes = beancount, orgstruct, yasnippet, company. I also customized alignment rules (emacs built-in) for text-mode. I am actually learning some bits. The fact is I have other priorities than dealing with elisp code. And actually I would be happier if you (Blais) continue to focus on beancount (not for emacs) or fava. I see a lot of work for 2019: close issues or shrink/update documentation :-) or make enhancements, for instance. I think beancount deserves a major-mode for emacs BUT please, don't waste your time. I can survive with notepad if needed (it's not) and anyone are free to choose an editor (Sublime, Notepad++, VSCode, ...). If you pay attention only to emacs you'll never reach 100% "customer satisfaction". So please only do for you. Júlio -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to beancount@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/f83027b1-35b4-4e93-b100-c2dd6980743f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
