On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 7:24 AM Daniele Nicolodi <dani...@grinta.net> wrote:
> On 31/01/24 22:23, Chary Chary wrote: > > Dan, > > > > I thought that the main idea of beancount v3 was migrating some > > functionality to C++ to make the thing be faster. > > > > If this is not being done in beancount v3, are there any other > > improvements which make it worth using as an opposite to v2 at the > moment? > > The C++ rewrite has seen significant progress but it has never landed in > a form where it can be used from a beancount application. > That's correct. It stalled on two things: - not much free time to play with open source anymore (sad) - a decent kludge I had to make passing protobufs between Python and C++ got taken away in a change in protobuf itself I've pretty much decided to explore Rust as an alternative (not much progress, again, no time to play) > The major change in the v3 branch is that beancount.ingest has been > split of and significantly restructured into the beangulp project, that > beancount.query has been split of into the beanquery project and > significantly improved, that the deprecated bean-report and bean-web > functionality have been removed, and several other cleanups. A detailed > list of changes has not been compiled. > > Cheers, > Dan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Beancount" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/8e4ad0b7-e480-4cfd-866a-8f995dd424dd%40grinta.net > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/CAK21%2BhN2sLNvGVojq8HkGt%3Dz-GhQgPGbBVqF7Lq9Avw%2B8OjpjQ%40mail.gmail.com.
