On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] opined: :> CGI.pm--a threat to our way of life! Down with the troglodytes! :) :Well, not exactly my point, but ok :) Just kidding :I just think there are too many who close their minds to anything but CGI.pm, :including potentially :more efficient customized solutions. i would guess that, for the purposes of this mailing list, most who recommend using CGI.pm do so because this list is aimed at beginners, and they most definitely should be using it to parse query strings. other available solutions, and the semantics of using them, probably wouldn't be a good place for a beginner to learn about cgi programming. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Displaying Problems perl-dvd
- Re: Displaying Problems Brian
- Templates v/s CGI.pm [WAS:] Displaying Problems Todd Wade
- RE: Displaying Problems Bob Showalter
- RE: Displaying Problems Bob Showalter
- Re: Displaying Problems perl-dvd
- RE: Displaying Problems Bob Showalter
- Re: Displaying Problems perl-dvd
- Using CGI.pm [WAS Re: Displaying Problems] John Brooking
- Re: Displaying Problems fliptop
- Re: Displaying Problems perl-dvd
- Re: Displaying Problems perl-dvd
- RE: Displaying Problems Bob Showalter
- Re: Displaying Problems perl-dvd
- Re: Displaying Problems Niko Gunadi
- CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displaying Proble... Todd Wade
- RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displayin... Scot Robnett
- RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] Displ... Felix Geerinckx
- RE: CGI.pm v/s roll-your-own [WAS:] ... Scot Robnett