Chris Devers wrote:
if you need a speed boost then the best strategies are to [a] use a
smaller subset of CGI.pm,
Does that really make a lot of difference? In this benchmark:
http://groups.google.se/groups?selm=bp9hb9%241kv1vv%241%40ID-184292.news.uni-berlin.de
I used the smallest possible subset, and CGI.pm still appeared to be
absurdly slow. Or are you saying that, given that the module is
already loaded, using all the HTML generating stuff would consume
significantly more CPUs?
[c] use mod_perl.
If you use mod_perl, you don't need to compile CGI.pm (or anything
else) everytime a script is invoked, so in that respect I can
understand what you mean. But would mod_perl have a significant
impact on speed in any other respect? Isn't it still a set of code
that shall be executed?
--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Email: http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
