On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 13:21:15 +0100, Jenda Krynicky wrote:
>> There is absolutely _no_ reason why one shouldn't use the CGI.pm
>> module.

> There is one. If /s?he/ is using CGI::Lite instead ;-)

In that case, there are many reasons.  There are a lot of CGI::* modules
out there.

My point is still valid, though;  Why do one want to use CGI::Lite instead
of CGI.pm?  Is it better?  No.  Is it safer?  No.  Is it faster?  No.  Is
it more widely used?  No.  Does it come with the Perl distribution?  No.


-- 
Tore Aursand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to