On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:06:24 -0600, Wiggins d Anconia wrote
>
> Yikes, funny I see this as a feature. You were still passing the wrong
> value, your sub should validate the parameters itself, presuming
> thorough code, it would still have caused an error.
No comprende.
> Typed return value, yikes, you have just cut out half of the value of
> using a 4GL... Back to C with you! ;-) Let's see if we can get P5P
> to implement pointer arithmetic for references...uh....
No, Java has this and no pointer arithmetic is required.
> As Bob stated, I have never used them, though I don't consider
> myself a true guru.
I would like to use them if just for documentation purposes - it is just
slightly more clear to me to see
sub something( $$$ )
{
than
sub something
{
Still nothing near what I would hope for in 2004, but at least a step.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
