Agree with John. I support the adoption.
On 4/13/17, 12:03 PM, "sfc on behalf of John E Drake" <sfc-boun...@ietf.org on
behalf of jdr...@juniper.net> wrote:
M&T,
I still support the adoption. I looked at the subject patent and it
appears to have very little to do with draft-mackie. I think this means that
the IPR assertion would be similarly made against *any* solution developed by
BESS.
Yours Irrespectively,
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sfc [mailto:sfc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 2:04 PM
> To: BESS <bess@ietf.org>
> Cc: s...@ietf.org
> Subject: [sfc] Extra time to reflect on
draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane
> adoption following the IPR disclosure
>
> WG
>
> Given the IPR disclosed [1] against
> draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane, we are starting a call for
comment
> specifically to let people express a revised opinion on how
draft-ietf-bess-nsh-
> bgp-control-plane should be pursued in BESS.
>
> This call for comment is open until the 5th of May
>
> Thanks
> M&T
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2980/
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> s...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
s...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
