I also agree with John. Cheers, Andy
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Keyur Patel <ke...@arrcus.com> wrote: > Agree with John. I support the adoption. > > On 4/13/17, 12:03 PM, "sfc on behalf of John E Drake" < > sfc-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of jdr...@juniper.net> wrote: > > M&T, > > I still support the adoption. I looked at the subject patent and it > appears to have very little to do with draft-mackie. I think this means > that the IPR assertion would be similarly made against *any* solution > developed by BESS. > > Yours Irrespectively, > > John > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sfc [mailto:sfc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin > Vigoureux > > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 2:04 PM > > To: BESS <bess@ietf.org> > > Cc: s...@ietf.org > > Subject: [sfc] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp- > control-plane > > adoption following the IPR disclosure > > > > WG > > > > Given the IPR disclosed [1] against > > draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane, we are starting a call for > comment > > specifically to let people express a revised opinion on how > draft-ietf-bess-nsh- > > bgp-control-plane should be pursued in BESS. > > > > This call for comment is open until the 5th of May > > > > Thanks > > M&T > > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2980/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sfc mailing list > > s...@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc > > _______________________________________________ > sfc mailing list > s...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc > > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
