On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Damir Prebeg <blend.fact...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I don't think *anyone* is suggesting that the Blender code "end up in >> some closed source software". We're looking at making Blender capable >> (legally) of using third-party distributed closed-source plugins. This >> is about *extending* Blender, not taking parts of it and making them >> proprietary. >> > > No, it's not a debate about how to legally use third-party closed source > plug-ins in Blender.
Uh, that is exactly the reason I've joined this discussion. And I think that is the reason most people here are discussing this topic as well. I've got nothing against big Silicon Valley companies, but the main issue is that third-party closed plugins simply can't coincide with the GPL unless you somehow break the GPL, and that is something I would like to see changed. If I somehow gave you some other impression please excuse me. _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
