If we have two solutions only then the second worst is the best, right? right?
Ahem.... Most people (OK, that is two out of three admittedly :p) seem to agree that the result is too bright and that extra controls are redundant. In that case it makes sense to just dim the default material - the only one users have no control over - and leave manual specularity control through the color widget for the rest. I'm going to leave this as is from now and see how others like it. On 2 December 2014 at 02:30, Mikhail Rachinskiy <wellmader...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Antony, > > https://developer.blender.org/rB4ee53074aa951c42b0fb0899cd6376d124992304 > OK, you chosen the second worst possible solution for this issue. > > Would you also introduce new factor for default Cycles material? > > -- > Regards, > Mikhail Rachinskiy > jewelcourses.com > rachinskiy.com > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Mikhail Rachinskiy <wellmader...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Or we can make default intensity value for BI materials equal to 1 to > make > > materials look similar between BI and Cycles, after that we can lower > > default Diffuse and Specular RGB values for both BI and Cycles. > > > > I thinks it is the best possible solution which will not affect old > > materials and does not require additional factors. > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Mikhail Rachinskiy > > > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > Bf-committers@blender.org > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
